June 23, 2017
This case discusses some of the factors that judges will weigh when considering whether to allow digital recordings to be submitted as evidence.
June 16, 2017
This case provides an example of how the proposed changes to the Children’s Law Reform Act, which ultimately resulted in the All Families Are Equal Act, are to be considered and applied.
June 9, 2017
This case serves as a great example of how not to avoid child support. Justice Sheilagh M. O’Connell of the Ontario Court of Justice deals with a father trying to get out of paying child support in a very strange way. The father’s defence: he is a victim of sexual DNA theft.
June 2, 2017
This case serves as an exception to the rule that double-dipping in pensions should be avoided. In this case, the Court is faced with the issue of whether a pension that was already used for an equalization payment should be used to fulfill spousal support payments for a dependent spouse.
May 26, 2017
In this case, Parent J. of the Ontario Court of Justice addressed the role of a report from the Office of the Children’s Lawyer (OCL) in light of conflicting requests from the parents. This begs the question; how much weight and relevance should be given to an assessment report when making a temporary order?
Death, Divorce and Dollar Amounts: How Life Insurance Is Being Used as Security for Support Payments
May 19, 2017
Dagg v. Cameron Estate, 2017 ONCA 366 This recent decision alters the way Canadian legal minds view the treatment of insurance in cases of spousal or child support. It also offers further definition of the payor/payee relationship in cases of spousal and child support as one of a creditor and debtor.
May 12, 2017
This recent decision serves as a cautionary tale to those who disobey disclosure orders. In his decision, Price J. ordered that the Respondent father pay $24,900 for his failure to disclose his financial information within a reasonable period of time.
May 5, 2017
McClintock v. Karam, 2017 ONCA 277: This recent decision from the Court of Appeal causes some confusion with respect to the characterization of stay orders for the purposes of appeal, and the requirements for an exception to the general rule that an order granting a stay is final, but an order refusing a stay is interlocutory.
April 28, 2017
In this case, the Applicant Husband brought a motion for an order pursuant to section 2(8) of the Family Law Act (FLA), extending time to bring an application for an equalization payment pursuant to section 7(3) of the FLA. The Respondent Wife opposed the motion on the basis that the Husband was not able to satisfy the grounds in section 2(8) and that he failed to file a claim for equitable relief within two years as required under the Limitations Act.
April 21, 2017
In this appeal from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, the Ontario Court of Appeal held that structured settlement annuity payments are to be treated as income rather than property.
April 17, 2017
This recent decision by Justice Fryer of the Superior Court of Justice is a well written decision that provides a very good summary of the law of costs. However, it also serves as a caution to family law litigants as to the costs of litigation, and reminds litigants that even if they feel as though they were largely successful with respect to the outcome of the case, this does not necessarily mean that they will be receiving their costs of the litigation on a full indemnity basis.
April 7, 2017
In this recent decision of the Superior Court of Justice, the court considers the appropriate amount of damages to award when there is been an invasion of privacy within a domestic relationship. Further, the Court considers the sum of damages to award when considering incidents of domestic violence.
March 31, 2017
This appeal concerns an application by a minor for a declaration that she has withdrawn from parental control. The father of a 17-year-old girl appeals a declaration that she has withdrawn from parental control.
March 24, 2017
This recent decision from the Ontario Court of Appeal provides guidance for family law litigants and counsel with respect to the jurisdiction for subsidiary dispute resolution. The Court is firm in their finding that in high conflict cases, best practice mandates that the same judge continue to hear subsidiary disputes.
March 17, 2017
This decision from the Ontario Court of Appeal canvasses whether an Ontario Court has the jurisdiction to award child support, spousal support, and equalization of net family property after a foreign court has issued a divorce.